Dragon's Shadow: Fee Fi Fo Fum
Interesting. In the last few decades they've found an amazing series of archeological finds. First they found a stone monument of the philistines commemorating a victory over the "house of David" that proved that a historical David did exist. Then they found more recently the stone tomb of Odyseus and the original Ithaca. Then they found a Christian holy place and a surviving mosiac with the original symbol of Christianity - the fish. Now they've found an inscription of Goliath's name at his home town:
Scientists find ‘Goliath’ inscribed on potteryReference from 950 B.C. lends credence to Bible tale, archaeologists say
JERUSALEM - Archaeologists digging at the purported biblical home of Goliath have unearthed a shard of pottery bearing an inscription of the Philistine’s name, a find they claimed lends historical credence to the Bible’s tale of David’s battle with the giant.
While the discovery is not definitive evidence of Goliath’s existence, it does support the Bible’s depiction of life at the time the battle was supposed to have occurred, said Dr. Aren Maeir, a professor at Bar-Ilan University and director of the excavation.
“What this means is that at the time there were people there named Goliath,” he said. “It shows us that David and Goliath’s story reflects the cultural reality of the time.” In the story, David slew Goliath with a slingshot.
Some scholars assert the story of David slaying the giant Goliath is a myth written down hundreds of years later. Maeir said finding the scraps lends historical credence to the biblical story.
The shard dates back to around 950 B.C., within 70 years of when biblical chronology asserts David squared off against Goliath, making it the oldest Philistine inscription ever found, the archaeologists said.
Scientists made the discovery at Tel es-Safi, a dig site in southern Israel thought to be to be the location of the Philistine city of Gath.
I've always felt that the Biblical stories were in fact based on actual historical personages. As for the exact accuracy of the stories they did read more like history than most ancient texts, often showing the foilibles and flaws of the all too human characters described. The description of the whining and complaining and general back-biting were too hilariously close to modern human behavior to be entirely fabricated. However even so I never expected so much evidence of the ancient stories to be verified even in outline. Which is all cool, but it makes me worry a little bit. I mean the existence of Odyseus's tomb doesn't for instance verify that he once held the four winds in a bag at his disposal. There is still plenty of room for exagerated elements.
